Engineer

MAY-AUG 2013

Engineer presents professional information designed to keep U.S. military and civilian engineers informed of current and emerging developments within their areas of expertise for the purpose of enhancing their professional development.

Issue link: https://engineer.epubxp.com/i/145930

Contents of this Issue

Navigation

Page 3 of 43

Clear the Way Brigadier General Peter A. (Duke) DeLuca Commandant, U.S. Army Engineer School "Whoever wins the reconnaissancecounterreconnaissance aspect of the battle wins the overall battle." —94th Engineer Regiment Commandant (me) and a lot of other military professionals S adly, this is my last Clear the Way article. The Army has placed another challenge and opportunity for professional and personal growth in my path. I will be replaced at the end of July 2013 by Brigadier General Anthony C. Funkhouser; and he will be a magnifcent commandant, coach, leader, and role model for our great Regiment. I am honored to replace Major General John W. Peabody in September as the commanding general of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Mississippi Valley Division and the chairman of the Mississippi River Commission. This column will not be a litany of achievements over the past 20 months of my very precious, all too brief, but enjoyable time as the 94th commandant of the Engineer Regiment. However, I do believe that we have made great strides in adapting and refning every area of doctrine, organization, training, materiel, leader development, personnel, and facilities (DOTMLPF) for our Regiment. We have things moving in the right direction in all areas, with some extra work needed on facilities here at the home of the Regiment and at home stations around the Army. Please view my 19 April 2013 address to the Regiment at to hear a relatively current update on developments across the DOTMLPF. Also pay close attention to the 25 June 2013 announcement of Army plans at . These plans and actions may be enabled or hindered by Department of Defense and Army budgeting decisions that will be made over the next 3 to 12 months. For my last formal, offcial words, I will return to a topic that somewhat obsesses my mind—the matter of how we reorganize, reequip, and retrain our Army and engineer forces to routinely win the reconnaissance-counterreconnaissance battle (something we have not done well in the past two wars) facing the kind of enemies that we have faced and will continue to face for another generation. We have a lot of new tools and some new experiences to help us see and fnd enemies hiding among the population; 2 Engineer sheltering and defending in compartmented terrain (urban, mountain, and/ or jungle); and employing modern and improvised weaponry and intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance, and communications capabilities in clever ways that deny advantages of our standoff sensors and long-range fres/strikes. Our inability to routinely win the reconnaissance-counterreconnaissance battle was one reason (in my opinion, the main reason) that we did not achieve more decisive results in Iraq and Afghanistan much sooner. Let's state it again: Whoever wins the reconnaissance-counterreconnaissance aspect of the battle wins the overall battle. I'm a very amateur historian and have searched hard for examples from history in which this was not the case—because every rule must have an exception or two. But I cannot fnd the exception. Not yet. If anyone in the feld has examples of exceptions, please send them to me at . Even better, submit your examples and lessons learned to Engineer at for all of us to discuss and debate (see the writer's guide on page 33.) Engineers are central to the reconnaissancecounterreconnaissance battle. Our forces conduct reconnaissance and security operations to fght this battle. To better analyze how engineers ft within these operations, let's consult some very sound, recently updated doctrine. Field Manual 3-90.2, Reconnaissance, Security, and Tactical Enabling Tasks, Volume 2, identifes seven fundamentals of successful reconnaissance: ■ Ensure continuous reconnaissance. ■ Do not keep reconnaissance assets in reserve. ■ Orient on the reconnaissance objective. ■ Report information rapidly and accurately. ■ Retain freedom of maneuver. ■ Gain and maintain enemy contact. ■ Develop the situation rapidly.1 You can see that engineer reconnaissance, which includes route clearance operations (singly or as combined arms operations) and technical engineer reconnaissance, fts within the frst three fundamentals. The ffth May–August 2013

Articles in this issue

Links on this page

Archives of this issue

view archives of Engineer - MAY-AUG 2013